Quality of Life Analysis of Patients Treated with Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion for Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases.

PURPOSE: Percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan (M-PHP) is a minimally invasive therapy with proven efficacy in patients with uveal melanoma (UM) liver metastases. M-PHP is associated with a short hospital admission time and limited systemic side effects. In this study, we assessed quality of life (QoL) in UM patients treated with M-PHP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, single-center study including 24 patients treated with M-PHP for UM metastases to the liver. QoL questionnaires were collected at baseline, on day 2/3 after M-PHP, and on day 7 and day 21 after M-PHP, according to study protocol. The results were scored according to EORTC-QLQ C30 global health status (GHS), functional scales, and symptom scales. The difference in scores at baseline and subsequent time points was analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and multiple testing Bonferroni correction. Adverse events (AE) were registered up to 30 days after M-PHP according to CTCAE v5.0. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (14 males; median age 63.0 years) completed 96 questionnaires. Most scores on all scales declined on day 2/3 after M-PHP. On day 21 after M-PHP, 12 out of 15 scores returned to baseline, including median GHS scores. Three variables were significantly worse on day 21 compared to baseline: fatigue (6-33; p = 0.002), physical functioning (100 vs 86.7; p = 0.003), and role functioning (100 vs 66.7; p = 0.001). Grade 3/4 AEs consisted mainly of hematological complications, such as leukopenia and thrombopenia. CONCLUSION: M-PHP causes fatigue and a decline in physical and role functioning in the 1st weeks after treatment, but GHS returns to baseline levels within 21 days. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3: Cohort study.

Combining Melphalan Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion with Ipilimumab Plus Nivolumab in Advanced Uveal Melanoma: First Safety and Efficacy Data from the Phase Ib Part of the Chopin Trial.

PURPOSE: To define a safe treatment dose of ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO) when applied in combination with percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan (M-PHP) in metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) patients (NCT04283890), primary objective was defining a safe treatment dose of IPI/NIVO plus M-PHP. Toxicity was assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03 (CTCAEv4.03). Secondary objective was response rate, PFS and OS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients between 18-75 years with confirmed measurable hepatic mUM according to RECIST 1.1 and WHO performance score 0-1 were included. Intravenous IPI was applied at 1 mg/kg while NIVO dose was increased from 1 mg/kg in cohort 1 to 3 mg/kg in cohort 2. Transarterial melphalan dose for M-PHP was 3 mg/kg (maximum of 220 mg) in both cohorts. Treatment duration was 12 weeks, consisting of four 3-weekly courses IPI/NIVO and two 6-weekly M-PHPs. RESULTS: Seven patients were included with a median age of 63.6 years (range 50-74). Both dose levels were well tolerated without dose-limiting toxicities or deaths. Grade III/IV adverse events (AE) were observed in 2/3 patients in cohort 1 and in 3/4 patients in cohort 2, including Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), febrile neutropenia and cholecystitis. Grade I/II immune-related AEs occurred in all patients, including myositis, hypothyroidism, hepatitis and dermatitis. There were no dose-limiting toxicities. The safe IPI/NIVO dose was defined as IPI 1 mg/kg and NIVO 3 mg/kg. There was 1 complete response, 5 partial responses and 1 stable disease (3 ongoing responses with a median FU of 29.1 months). CONCLUSION: Combining M-PHP with IPI/NIVO was safe in this small cohort of patients with mUM at a dose of IPI 1 mg/kg and NIVO 3 mg/kg.

Combining Hepatic Percutaneous Perfusion with Ipilimumab plus Nivolumab in advanced uveal melanoma (CHOPIN): study protocol for a phase Ib/randomized phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: While immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has revolutionized the treatment of metastatic cutaneous melanoma, no standard treatments are available for patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (UM). Several locoregional therapies are effective in the treatment of liver metastases, such as percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan (M-PHP). The available literature suggests that treatment with ICI following locoregional treatment of liver UM metastases can result in clinical response. We hypothesize that combining M-PHP with ICI will lead to enhanced antigen presentation and increased immunomodulatory effect, improving control of both hepatic and extrahepatic disease. METHODS: Open-label, single-center, phase Ib/randomized phase II trial, evaluating the safety and efficacy of the combination of M-PHP with ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4 antibody) and nivolumab (anti-PD-1 antibody) in patients with unresectable hepatic metastases of UM in first-line treatment, with or without the limited extrahepatic disease. The primary objective is to determine the safety, toxicity, and efficacy of the combination regimen, defined by maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 1 year. Secondary objectives include overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR). A maximum of 88 patients will be treated in phase I and phase II combined. Baseline characteristics will be described with descriptive statistics (t-test, chi-square test). To study the association between risk factors and toxicity, a logistic regression model will be applied. PFS and OS will be summarized using Kaplan-Meier curves. DISCUSSION: This is the first trial to evaluate this treatment combination by establishing the maximum tolerated dose and evaluating the efficacy of the combination treatment. M-PHP has shown to be a safe and effective treatment for UM patients with liver metastases and became the standard treatment option in our center. The combination of ICI with M-PHP is investigated in the currently described trial which might lead to a better treatment response both in and outside the liver. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in the US National Library of Medicine with identifier NCT04283890 . Registered as per February 2020 - Retrospectively registered. EudraCT registration number: 2018-004248-49. Local MREC registration number: NL60508.058.19.

Isolated hepatic perfusion with oxaliplatin combined with 100 mg melphalan in patients with metastases confined to the liver: A phase I study.

AIM: To improve isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP), we performed a phase I dose-escalation study to determine the optimal oxaliplatin dose in combination with a fixed melphalan dose. METHODS: Between June 2007 and July 2008, 11 patients, comprising of 8 colorectal cancer and 3 uveal melanoma patients and all with isolated liver metastases, were treated with a one hour IHP with escalating doses of oxaliplatin combined with 100 mg melphalan. Samples of blood and perfusate were taken during IHP treatment for pharmacokinetic analysis of both drugs and patients were monitored for toxicity, response and survival. RESULTS: Dose limiting sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) occurred at 150 mg oxaliplatin. The areas under the concentration-time curves (AUC) of oxaliplatin at the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of 100 mg oxaliplatin ranged from 11.9 mg/L h to 16.5 mg/L h. All 4 patients treated at the MTD showed progressive disease 3 months after IHP. CONCLUSIONS: In view of similar and even higher doses of oxaliplatin applied in both systemic treatment and hepatic artery infusion (HAI), applying this dose in IHP is not expected to improve treatment results in patients with isolated hepatic metastases.

Isolated hepatic melphalan perfusion of colorectal liver metastases: outcome and prognostic factors in 154 patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors for local and systemic failure after isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) with 200 mg melphalan in patients with colorectal liver metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Hundred and fifty-four patients were selected for IHP and underwent laparotomy. Patients were monitored for response, toxicity and survival. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to identify prognostic factors for hepatic response and progression-free and overall survival. RESULTS: Hepatic response rate was 50% with a median progression-free and overall survival of, respectively, 7.4 and 24.8 months. In multivariate analyses, absence of ability to perfuse through the hepatic artery (P = 0.003), severe postoperative complications (P = 0.048) and >10 liver metastases (P = 0.006) adversely influenced overall survival and no adjuvant chemotherapy adversely influenced progression-free survival. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to report prognostic factors for survival after IHP. Possibly, overall and disease-free survival can increase if preoperative screening is improved. In future studies on IHP, adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered.

Hepatic artery infusion of high-dose melphalan at reduced flow during isolated hepatic perfusion for the treatment of colorectal metastases confined to the liver: a clinical and pharmacologic evaluation.

Isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) offers the advantage of high local drug exposure with limited systemic toxicity. To increase local drug exposure, we administered melphalan at a reduced flow in the hepatic artery during IHP (hepatic artery infusion, hepatic artery-portal vein perfusion, HI-HPP). Between December 2001 and December 2004, 30 patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases underwent HI-HPP with 200mg melphalan. Samples of the perfusate were taken for pharmacokinetic analysis. Patients were monitored for response, toxicity and survival. Perfusion was aborted prematurely in 2 patients due to leakage. During melphalan administration in the hepatic inflow cannula a mean flow rate of 121.3 mL/min and mean pressure of 62.5mm Hg were achieved. One patient died within 30 days after HI-HPP. Four patients developed veno-occlusive disease (VOD), while 2 patients showed signs of VOD. Twelve patients showed hepatic response, with a median duration of response of 11.5 months, according to WHO criteria. Although HI-HPP results in high perfusate melphalan concentration levels, it is associated with a relatively high level of hepatotoxicity and a limited response rate. We believe that the low flow and pressure rates found in this study can result in reduced drug penetration of the tumour and thus limited tumour response.

Isolated hepatic perfusion with high-dose melphalan for the treatment of colorectal metastasis confined to the liver.

BACKGROUND: Isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) involves complete vascular isolation of the liver to allow treatment with doses that would be toxic if delivered systemically. A phase II study of IHP in patients with colorectal metastases confined to the liver was performed. METHODS: Seventy-three patients with irresectable colorectal metastases underwent IHP with high-dose melphalan (200 mg) for 1 h. Toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria and tumour response was assessed according to World Health Organization criteria. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were perfused according to the protocol. Four patients died within 30 days after IHP, resulting in an operative mortality rate of 5.6 per cent. Sixteen patients (22.5 per cent) experienced grade 3-4 hepatotoxicity 1 week after IHP, which was transient and resolved within 3 months in all patients. The tumour response rate (complete or partial remission) was 59 per cent. Median time to progression was 7.7 (range 2.3-31.4) months. Overall median survival after IHP was 28.8 months with a 3-year survival rate of 37 per cent. CONCLUSION: IHP for irresectable colorectal metastases confined to the liver resulted in good response rates and long-term survival in a selected group of patients.